Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Daryl C Rogers
Defendant:
Timothy Howard, James Jolly, Aaron Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Vaughn Cook v. Martin Tochtrop et al
as 5:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
Christopher Vaughn Cook and Cardinal Silvester Coleone
Defendant:
Martin Tochtrop, Custodians of Psychiatrist, Medical Clinic Operators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00422
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2021cv05311
Plaintiff:
Daryl Rogers
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Fithian, Lystad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DaGreat v. Haynes et al
as 3:2021cv05080
Plaintiff:
NB'Tehute Heru-Ptah DaGreat and Terrell Lamar Wilson
Defendant:
J Jolly, T Cardin and Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstead v. Haynes et al
as 3:2020cv05327
Defendant:
Kendra Wakefield, Annice Mizin, Robert Herzog and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell M Armstead, Jr, Casey Woodson, Justin T Dull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Rose et al
as 3:2019cv00046
Defendant:
D. Tristian, H. Ivie, PA Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes #169588 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01632
Petitioner:
Cardinal Micheaux Barnes
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hendrix v. Ray et al
as 3:2018cv00053
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, R Boone-Sharp, Ronald Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Ray et al
as 2:2017cv01719
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, S Boyer, Ronald Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
