Cases 1 - 10 of 247
Carr v. Nevelle et al
as 3:2024cv01858
Plaintiff:
Quinton Carr
Defendant:
J. Nevelle, J. Gutierrez and V. Bugarin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Michael Carr
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carr v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Michael Carr
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kauffman #360639 v. Arizona State Prison Complex Eyman Rynning Unit et al
as 2:2023cv01278
Plaintiff:
Zion Z Kauffman
Defendant:
Arizona State Prison Complex Eyman Rynning Unit, Arizona State Prison Complex Eyman SMU Unit, Mohave County Adult Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B-3-88-A, et al. v. Sileoni 98822
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
William B-3-88-A, Linzy, Thompson and others
Defendant:
Sileoni 98822
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starkgraf v. Inslee et al
as 3:2023cv05487
Plaintiff:
Kristopher S Starkgraf
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Melissa A Hemstreet, Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starkgraf v. Lyons et al
as 3:2023cv05497
Plaintiff:
Kristopher S Starkgraf and Kris
Defendant:
Samantha Lyons, Melissa A Hemstreet, Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Page et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Chad Page, Amanda Gentry, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt, Chad Page, Jack Fraiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jody Carr v. David Nye, et al
as 22-36052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JODY R.O. CARR
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID C. NYE, Judge, B. LYNN WINMILL, Judge, JOSH TEWALT, Director IDOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
