Cases 1 - 10 of 10,101
Seely v. Karlan et al
as 4:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Seely, Jr.
Defendant:
S Karlan, R Fragoso, Unknown Sauceda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawes v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Robert Dennis Hawes
Respondent:
S. Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Bonilla v. Hayes et al
as 3:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
William Q. Hayes, John A. Houston, Judge Bernard G. Skomal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mueller v. Ybarra et al
as 3:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mueller
Defendant:
J. Ybarra, C.O. Lay, K. Hofman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gallegos v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Gallegos
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Leech, S. Boxall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cano v. Salmonson et al
as 2:2024cv01568
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cano
Defendant:
S. Salmonson, Figueroa-Price and Appel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Inslee et al
as 3:2024cv05417
Plaintiff:
Ryan S Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Robert Ferguson and Jennifer Rheaume
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Doyle
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Warden William Gittere, Christopher Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Regal
as 3:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Hart
Defendant:
Christina Regal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amador v. Anderson
as 2:2024cv00737
Petitioner:
Daniel S Amador, II
Respondent:
Lisa Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
