Cases 1 - 10 of 565
Wilcox v. Peck et al
as 3:2024cv08115
Plaintiff:
Travis Ray Wilcox
Defendant:
Clayton Peck and Chad Fieple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamez #131401 v. Lesinski et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Robert Carrasco Gamez, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Lesinski, Unknown McElroy, Travis Fitzgibbon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Jovanovich et al
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Anthony Evans
Defendant:
Sam Jovanovich, Travis Jones and Kimberly Malcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flesch v. Malcomb et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cody Joseph Vernon Flesch
Defendant:
Kimberly Malcomb, Travis Jones and Ray Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Arias et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Travis Ellis
Defendant:
Roberto Arias, Brenda Figueroa, Marco Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedric Garnett Johnson v. Travis Pennington et al
as 5:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cedric Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Pennington, D. Mortimer, D. Tristan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Travis Horton
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Goodman v. Reyes et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Travis Jack Goodman
Defendant:
Reyes and Donny Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roper v. Landers
as 3:2023cv01907
Petitioner:
Floyd Travis Roper
Respondent:
Sheriff Landers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Smith v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2023cv02919
Plaintiff:
Travis Smith
Defendant:
Sacramento County, Phan and Colley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
