Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
United States of America v. 2021 Toyota TRD 4Runner, VIN: JTEPU5JR4M5948693 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023mc00350
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 2021 Toyota TRD 4Runner, VIN: JTEPU5JR4M5948693 and 2022 Mercedes Benz AMG CLA 4MATIC, VIN: W1K3G4EB0NJ364663
Claimant: Michael J. Bowden, Michael W. Bowden and Kasandra Dolan
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 2901 W Dakota St., Tucson, AZ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00219
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 2901 W Dakota St., Tucson, AZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 1725 W Burnside Trail, Phoenix, Arizona 85085
as 2:2021cv01878
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property Located at 1725 W Burnside Trail, Phoenix, Arizona 85085
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. 2019 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG-S, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020mc00072
Defendant: Approximately $3,325.00 Seized from Lamassu BTM Located at 14701 San Pablo Avenue, San Pablo, California, Approximately $1,712,611.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately 18.12902639 Bitcoin and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
United States of America v. 2019 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG-S, VIN: WDDZF8KB8KA608709, California License Number 1UEV351 et al
as 2:2020at00320
Defendant: Approximately $3,325.00 Seized from Lamassu BTM Located at 14701 San Pablo Avenue, San Pablo, California, Approximately $1,712,611.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately 18.12902639 Bitcoin and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
USA v. 1971 Chevrolet Chevelle et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Defendant: 1971 Chevrolet Chevelle, 2012 Cadillac CTS, 2006 Dodge Commercial Sprinter Van and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Samuel Stocks-Ladd
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 9mm machinegun manufactured by Parabellum Combat Systems/ Silver Bullet Gun Works, Model PCS-9, Serial No. 50799, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00496
Defendant: 9mm machinegun manufactured by Parabellum Combat Systems/ Silver Bullet Gun Works, Model PCS-9, Serial No. 50799, et al, 7.62 caliber machinegun manufactured by Jaco Sales Co. LLC, Model MAG58, Serial No. MAG1131, .223 caliber machinegun manufactured by Heckler & Koch/ Silver Bullet Gun Works, Model HK93, Serial No. 507 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Real property at 5383 Stonehurst Drive, Martinez, California, Contra Costa County, APN: 367-230-018-7 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00636
Defendant: Real property at 4800 Blum Road, Unit 1, Martinez, California, Contra Costa County, APN: 159-400-001-8, Real property at 1062 Mohr Lane, Unit C, Concord, California, Contra Costa County, APN: 147-401-003-8, Real property at 4808 Blum Road, Unit 2, Martinez, California, Contra Costa County, APN: 159-400-002-6 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Dish Network California Service Corporation, Jeffrey Carpoff, Daysh Developments, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Trustee W. Donald Gieseke
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 157 W 57th St., Unit 42C, New York, NY, 10019 et al
as 2:2018cv01447
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 157 W 57th St., Unit 42C, New York, NY, 10019 and 3315 Collins Ave., Unit 9C/9D, Miami Beach, FL, 33140
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $12,950.00 in U.S. Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00138
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $12,950.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Craig W. Frazier
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?