Cases 91 - 100 of 14,982
Patrick Ayers et al v. Anthony Geisler et al
as 2:2024cv03937
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Petitioner:
Xponential Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
Anthony Geisler, Jair Clarke, Mark Grabowski and others
Yausmenda Freeman v. Joey Anthony Duran
as 2:2024cv03964
Plaintiff:
Yausmenda Freeman
Defendant:
Joey Anthony Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Capone v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Capone
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. County of Sacramento, et al.
as 24-2934
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEE ALLEN, JR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and RIO COSUMNES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
David Anthony Dean v. Unknown
as 5:2024cv00973
Petitioner:
David Anthony Dean
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timmons v. Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dwayne Timmons, III
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office, David O. Livingston, Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02732
Plaintiff:
Anthony Keith North
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Anthony Pagano v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv03731
Petitioner:
Anthony Pagano and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Thomson, et al. v. Hodgson, et al.
as 24-2858
Defendant:
CHARLES ROGER POMFRET HODGSON, Roger Hodgson and DELICATE MUSIC, a California general partnership
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS CAMPBELL THOMSON, JOHN ANTHONY HELLIWELL and ROBERT LAYNE SIEBENBERG
Brewer v. Burns et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Defendant:
William Burns, Stephan Breyer, Andrew Weissmann and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shelton Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
