Cases 101 - 110 of 127
Montes v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Steven Arthur Montes
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Tucson, City of, Pima, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sheryl Moulton v. Gayle Kern, et al
as 11-15584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERYL MOULTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GAYLE A. KERN, GAYLE A. KERN LTD., ULLA CHRISTENSEN and others
Sheryl Moulton v. Gayle Kern, et al
as 11-15526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERYL MOULTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GAYLE A. KERN, GAYLE A. KERN LTD, PHIL FRINK & ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Harris v. Elliott et al
as 1:2011cv00368
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Harris
Defendant:
M. Elliott, Henderson Benjamin, L. Spatola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moulton v. Kern
as 3:2011cv00087
Defendant:
Ulla Christsensen, John R. Coleman, Raymond Corrigan and others
Counter Claimant:
Gayle A. Kern and Gayle A. Kern, LTD
Counter Defendant:
Sheryl Moulton
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Moulton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moulton v. Kern et al
as 2:2010cv02264
Defendant:
Ulla Christensen, John R. Coleman, John R Colman and others
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Moulton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moulton v. Kern et al
as 5:2010cv03197
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Moulton
Defendant:
Gayle A Kern, Gayle A. Kern, Ltd, Phil Frink & Associates, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Harris v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2010cv01083
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Harris
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Wayne G. Tucker, Marco Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Bueno et al
as 3:2010cv00450
Plaintiff:
Willie L Harris
Defendant:
A Bueno, B Bligh and City of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Harris et al
as 3:2009cv05773
Plaintiff:
Lance W Burton
Defendant:
Robert L Harris, Mary Jo Harris and Clark County Commissioners Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
