Cases 11 - 20 of 582
Avalos-Escobar, et al. v. Garland
as 24-229
Petitioner:
MARBELYS ESTELA AVALOS-ESCOBAR and BARBARA CELINA AVALOS-ESCOBAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02546
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martinez Avalos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4060
Petitioner:
OSCAR MARTINEZ AVALOS, CONSTANTINA DEL CARMEN RAMIREZ LIMO, JEAN PIERRE MARTINEZ RAMIREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Avalos
as 23-3944
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE ALEJANDRO AVALOS
Avalos v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02003
Defendant:
Mesha Bakersville-Phillips, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Meshi Bakersville-Phillips
Plaintiff:
Eva Avalos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ferreira-Avalos v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ferreiro-Avalos and Carlos Ferreira-Avalos
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Ryan Thornell and Naphcare Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferreira-Avalos v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01813
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ferreira-Avalos
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lecia Shorter v. Leroy Baca, et al
as 23-55708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LECIA L. SHORTER
Defendant / Appellee:
LEROY BACA, GLORIA MOLINA, MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
