Cases 11 - 20 of 195
Lee v. Does 1-3
as 2:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Lee
Defendant:
John Does #1-3 and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0025 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Peter R. Tia v. Core Civic et al
as 5:2023cv02545
Defendant:
LDS, Core Civic, the City of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harvill v. Greer et al
as 2:2023cv01662
Plaintiff:
Adam Harvill
Defendant:
Rachel Greer, John/Jane Does 1-3 and Oregon Department of Human Services (DHS) - Child Welfare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Google LLC v. Does 1-3
as 5:2023cv05823
Plaintiff:
Google LLC
Defendant:
DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Savory v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 9:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Gerri Savory
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. d/b/a Walgreens #09242, John Does 1-3 and Doe Business Entities 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Matilde Garza v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv01849
Plaintiff:
Matilde Garza
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Bill Abernathy, Nicholas Krinder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Reed v. C. Muhammed, et al
as 23-55764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER J. REED
Defendant / Appellee:
C. MUHAMMED, RAMOS III, D. ROUSE and others
Garza v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
Matilde Garza
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Sheriff Shannon Dicus, Bill Abernathy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teri Sahm v. Karim Ali, et al
as 23-35537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERI KEALOHA SAHM and TERI SAHM
Defendant / Appellee:
KARIM ALI, JAGROOP SINGH, SETH GOODSTEIN and others
Jones v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv05572
Plaintiff:
Bartholomew Lee Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Steve Cinclair, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
