Cases 11 - 20 of 27
James Adams v. City of San Jose, et al
as 14-16442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, RISE JONES PICHON, Administrative Law Judge, Judge and others
James Adams, et al v. Aurora Loan Services, Inc., et al
as 14-15031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. ADAMS, Realtor and PUOY K. PREMSRIRUT, Realtor
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex. rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, INC., BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, BANK OF AMERICA, NA and others
Ingram v. Stonestown Shopping Center, L.P. et al
as 3:2013cv02733
Plaintiff:
Barry G. Ingram
Defendant:
Stonestown Shopping Center, L.P., Rick Forster, James A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. City of San Jose California
as 4:2012cv06276
Plaintiff:
James D. Adams
Defendant:
City of San Jose California, Santa Clara County Superior Court, Rise Jones Pichon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Uttecht
as 2:2012cv00349
Petitioner:
James Vincent Adams
Respondent:
Jeffery Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Vail et al
as 3:2012cv05286
Plaintiff:
James V Adams
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Mary L Byrd, Ray Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01564
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00003
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Adams
as 2:2011cv02964
Plaintiff:
HICA Education Loan Corporation
Defendant:
James C. Adams
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
