Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00023
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Peter Hannah v. New Jersey State Police, et al
as 11-35811
Plaintiff - Appellant: PETER PAUL HANNAH
Defendant - Appellee: NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, NEW JERSEY SHERIFF, WASHINGTON STATE POLICE and others
Nadolny v. New Jersey, State of et al
as 4:2011cv00406
Petitioner: Anthony James Nadolny
Respondent: New Jersey, State of and New Jersey State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hannah v. New Jersey State Police et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05513
Plaintiff: Peter Paul Hannah
Defendant: New Jersey State Police, New Jersey Sheriff, Washington State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2011cv00828
Plaintiff: Donald E Boyd
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02554
Plaintiff: Donald E Boyd
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Newton, et al v. Tenet Healthcare, et al
as 2:2002cv08462
Movant: 1199 Health Care Employees Pension Fund, Necati Aalkas, Gilbert Aronowitz and others
Defendant: Jeffrey C Barbakow, David L Dennis, Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff: Ogi Ivanov, New Jersey State of and Reginald Newton
Intervenor Defendant: KPMG LLP
Objector: Rinis Travel Services, Inc. Profit Sharing Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?