Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Taebel v. Ortega et al
as 2:2019cv05764
Defendant: Ortega and Ortega Lawyers, Alane Ortega, Mark Brnovich and others
Plaintiff: Mitchell T Taebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Benton County Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv05253
Defendant: Dennis Hanson, Office of Public Defense, Benton County Corrections and others
Plaintiff: Gregory Alan Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Benton County Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01776
Defendant: Dennis Hanson, Office of Public Defense, Benton County Corrections and others
Plaintiff: Gregory Alan Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orozco v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
as 2:2019cv02753
Defendant: Inmate Legal Services, Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Superior Court and others
Plaintiff: Eberardo Lopez Orozco, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam Martushoff v. State of Washington, et al
as 19-35067
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM REICHARDT, OFFICE OF THE OMBUDS, JAY INSLEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADAM S. MARTUSHOFF
Martushoff v. Luvera, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01870
Defendant: County of Skagit, Office of the Attorney General, State of Washington and others
Plaintiff: Adam S Martushoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Thompson v. John Hicks, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-35793
Plaintiff - Appellant: CURTIS S. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN TAYLOR HICKS, Attorney, Office of Public Defense, SCOTT O'TOOLE, King County Prosecutor, OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE and others
Thompson v. Hicks et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01065
Plaintiff: Curtis Shane Thompson
Defendant: John Taylor Hicks, Scott O'Toole, Office of Public Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?