Cases 11 - 20 of 2,356
Lettieri v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-3088
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC., SUSAN JOHNSON, PAUL E. BUNANNO and others
Garner v. SVSP Warden et al
as 3:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Randall James Garner
Defendant:
SVSP Warden and C/O M. Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02736
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Randall
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nathan Randall Beahn v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Nathan Randall Beahn
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tafari v. Rucker, et al.
as 24-2842
Plaintiff:
RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI
Defendant:
YVETTE RUCKER, JULIE RANDALL, GARRY MOLER and others
Routh v. Bank of America NA
as 2:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Randal Routh
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association and Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Gary Blackwell et al v. City of Beaumont et al
as 5:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Gary Blackwell and Shannon Luellen
Defendant:
City of Beaumont, Officer Anthony Becerra, Officer Fabian Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kington v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02295
Plaintiff:
Randal Kington
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Meadows et al v. Haws et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ruiz Meadows and GrandMaster G-Man Meadows
Defendant:
David Haws, Barry L Olsen, Estate of Darrell Davis/Jodi McCallister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wintrode v. Carter et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Tom Carter, Chris Hogan, Randall Buffalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
