Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Sorn v. Green et al
as 2:2019cv02606
Defendant:
Brain Moody, Robert Green, Charles L Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Sorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Green Maeschack v. Parrar et al
as 2:2018cv04224
Defendant:
Dr. Tyler Campbell, Dr. Tyler Campbell, F. Cota and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Green Maeschack
Duane Robert Greene et al v. Five Pawns, Inc.
as 8:2015cv01859
Defendant:
Five Pawns, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Duane Robert Greene, James Hirtzel and Shawn Randall Thomas
Pena et al v. Alliance Investment Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv02225
Plaintiff:
Yuralis Pena , Yanixan Texido Garcia , E.P. and others
Defendant:
Alliance Investment Corporation, Wayne Robert Green, Richard Raymond Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3604
In re: Peter Kravitz v. Dov Charney
as 15-56258
Not Classified By Court:
In re: AMERICAN APPAREL, INC., 2014 Derivative Shareholder Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMMY G. FEDERMAN and PETER KRAVITZ, as Trustee for and on behalf of AAI Litigation Trust,
Defendant / Appellee:
DOV CHARNEY, AMERICAN APPAREL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant, DAVID DANZIGER and others
Jan Willem Hubner et al v. Allan Mayer et al
as 2:2015cv02965
Defendant:
American Apparel, Inc., David Danziger, Robert Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Jan Willem Hubner and Eric Ribner
Charles Rendelman v. Dov Charney et al
as 2:2014cv05699
Defendant:
American Apparel, Inc., Dov Charney, Alberto Chehebar and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Rendelman
Tammy G. Federman v. Dov Charney et al
as 2:2014cv05230
Defendant:
American Apparel, Inc., Dov Charney, Alberto Chehebar and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy G Federman
Wong et al v. Colvin et al
as 3:2013cv02209
Defendant:
Barnsley Enterprise LLC, Carolyn W. Colvin, Disability Law Office NW, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Bernath and Martha Wong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
