Cases 11 - 20 of 212
Eugene Rutledge v. A. Martinez
as 23-15535
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE DARRELL RUTLEDGE
Respondent / Appellee:
A. L. MARTINEZ
Marc T. Crain v. Larry P. Crain, Sr. et al
as 5:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Marc T. Crain
Defendant:
Larry P. Crain, Sr., First Security Bank, Nathan Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Barnes v. Lavorato, Jr et al
as 2:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Defendant:
Sam Lavorato, Jr, Meagan Carter, Richard Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene Rutledge v. A. Martinez
as 23-15238
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE DARRELL RUTLEDGE
Respondent / Appellee:
A. L. MARTINEZ
Rutledge v. Acushnet Company et al
as 3:2022cv02045
Plaintiff:
Michael Rutledge
Defendant:
Acushnet Company, Lyn Miles and Does 1 to 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ea Removal- Employment Discrimination (Age)
Rutledge v. Roosevelt County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Richard L Rutledge
Defendant:
Roosevelt County Jail, Debra Collins, Roosevelt County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. Martinez
as 3:2022cv05563
Petitioner:
Eugene Darrel Rutledge
Respondent:
A. L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Best Carpet Values, Inc., et al v. Google LLC
as 22-15899
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BEST CARPET VALUES, INC. and THOMAS D. RUTLEDGE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC
Rutledge v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 2:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Rutledge, C. R. and L. R.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
