Cases 11 - 20 of 35
United States of America v. Jackson
as 6:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Kyle S. Jackson
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00673
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bailey v. Tyrell et al
as 2:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Justice Michael A. Cherry, Charles Thompson, Tao and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Candace Weidman v. Northrop Grumman Corp et al
as 8:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company Inc and Northrop Grumman Corp
Petitioner:
Candace Weidman
Respondent:
Northrop Grumman Corporation, Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
In Re:
The Estate of William S. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dickerson v. City of Marysville et al
as 2:2017cv02068
Plaintiff:
Dylan Dickerson
Defendant:
S. Jackson, K. Garza, Sutter County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Troy Anderson v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 17-16420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY J. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., for the State of California, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, Warden and others
Jeffrey S. Jackson et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 8:2017cv00947
Defendant:
DOES and USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S Jackson and Lori Ward Jackson
Joseph Rodriguez v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00434
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rodriguez
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Paul A. Hooper, Michael J. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Brooks v. San Quentin State Prison, et al
as 5:2016cv05550
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Brooks
Defendant:
San Quentin State Prison, CDCR, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-56117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
