Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Stebbins v. Garcia Baz
as 5:2024mc80006
Plaintiff:
David A. Stebbins
Defendant:
Thiago Chagas Garcia Baz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mark Daviscourt v. Gwannette Claybrook, et al
as 23-35397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK DAVISCOURT
Defendant / Appellee:
GWANNETTE M. CLAYBROOK, Acting Director, IRS Western Area Collection, STEVE BAKER, IRS Revenue Officer, PATRICIA L. DAVIS, IRS Appeals Advisor and others
Stebbins v. Bighorn Five Guys Acquisitions LLC
as 3:2023cv05457
Plaintiff:
Bailey O Stebbins
Defendant:
Bighorn Five Guys Acquisitions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
David Stebbins v. Karl Polano, et al
as 23-15531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS, DBA Acerthorn
Defendant / Appellee:
KARL POLANO, DBA Sofiannp, ALPHABET, INC., DISCORD, INC. and others
Stebbins v. Google LLC
as 3:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
David A. Stebbins
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Stebbins v. Doe
as 4:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
David A. Stebbins
Defendant:
John Doe doing business as Sidalpha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
David Stebbins v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70269
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS, KARL POLANO, ALPHABET, INC. and others
Petitioner:
DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Federman v. Widmar et al
as 2:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Max Federman
Defendant:
Mark Widmar, Michael J Ahearn, Richard D Chapman and others
Todd Ashker v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-16162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, SCOTT KERNAN, GEORGE GIURBINO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
