Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Worthen v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 3:2018cv01349
Plaintiff:
David Worthen
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rachel Lessem, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 17-80180
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RACHEL LESSEM, an individual, KIM HOLLIMAN, an individual, DEBORA BROICH, as wife and as an individual and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
PFIZER, INC.
Rachel Lessem, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 17-56294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL LESSEM, an individual, KIM HOLLIMAN, an individual, DEBORA BROICH, as wife and as an individual and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PFIZER, INC.
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and DOES, 1-50
Rachel Lessem et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02841
Plaintiff:
Jane E. Abbey, Hiawatha Barksdale, Margaret Beech and others
Defendant:
DOES, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03181
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ward v. Vasquez et al
as 6:2016cv00342
Defendant:
George Ambrosini, Debbie Garris, Randolph Garrison and others
Plaintiff:
Micheal Lee Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Worthen v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv01715
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas Worthen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Darrell Worthen v. Deborah Lee James
as 2:2015cv01747
Defendant:
Deborah Lee James
Plaintiff:
Darrell Worthen
Valenzuela #172770 v. Maricopa County Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2015cv00408
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Maricopa County Correctional Health Services, Kent Worthens, Victor Gan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenzuela #172770 v. Maricopa County Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2014cv02636
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Maricopa County Correctional Health Services, Kent Worthens, Victor Gan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
