Cases 21 - 30 of 250
Manetirony Clervrain v. Jessica Millan Patterson
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Mischael Smith and others
Defendant:
Jessica Millan Patterson, Peter Kuo, Sharon Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01644
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dean v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2021cv05822
Plaintiff:
Dustin Dean
Defendant:
Timothy Rankine, Masyih Ford, Tacoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter-Mixon et al v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2021cv05692
Plaintiff:
Monet Carter-Mixon, Estate of Manuel Ellis and marcia Carter
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Christopher burbank, Mathew collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin et al v. Homesite Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00997
Plaintiff:
Sean Rankin and Michelle Rankin
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rankin v. Thurston County et al
as 3:2021cv05499
Plaintiff:
Isaiah M Rankin and Isaiah Rankin
Defendant:
Thurston County Sheriffs Office, Devin Bagby, Thurston County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2021cv00255
Plaintiff:
John R Lopez
Defendant:
Jay Christensen, Lt. Nicodemus, Timothy McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2021cv00226
Defendant:
J. Does #1-2, Randy Valley, Susan Wessels and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00730
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sharif v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2021cv00310
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department, City of Eugene, Officer Ryan Trullinger and others
Plaintiff:
Muhsin Sharif
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
