Cases 21 - 30 of 19,782
McCullough v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2024cv03260
Plaintiff:
Colleen McCullough
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Mark Cota and Brendan Caraway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warner v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05414
Petitioner:
Mark Brian Warner
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patacsil, et al. v. Google LLC, et al.
as 24-3387
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON PATACSIL, individually, and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, GEORGE JACK, MARK CARSON and others
Appellant:
JOHN ANDREN, MATTHEW LILLEY and JOSEPH S. ST. JOHN
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC, XXVI HOLDINGS INC and ALPHABET INC.
Garcia v. City of Napa et al
as 3:2024cv03221
Plaintiff:
Perfecto Bauer Garcia
Defendant:
City of Napa, Tony Valadez, Jason Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Reich v. Silver Bow Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Reich
Defendant:
Silver Bow Detention Center, Mike Regan, Mark Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bialic v. Enphase Energy, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv03216
Plaintiff:
Mark Bialic
Defendant:
Enphase Energy, Inc., Badrinarayanan Kothandaraman and Mandy Yang
Gossett v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05408
Petitioner:
Mark J Gossett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hazari v. Santa Clara County Superior Court, et al.
as 24-3353
Plaintiff:
CYRUS HAZARI
Defendant:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, APPEAL COURT OF THE SIXTH DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT and others
Tennyson v. County Of Monterey et al
as 5:2024cv03191
Plaintiff:
Trisha Tennyson
Defendant:
County Of Monterey, Monterey County Animal Control, Salinas Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
