Cases 21 - 30 of 108
(HC) Capps v. Ciolli
as 1:2020cv00766
Respondent:
Ciolli
Petitioner:
Dennis Capps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Monro v. Cain et al
as 2:2020cv00866
Defendant:
Lisa Cain, Jeff Moura and Joe E Capps
Plaintiff:
Shawn Richard Monro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Lepesh v. Amy Pinkley-Wernz, et al
as 20-35052
Defendant / Appellee:
JANELL ROCHESTER, at SRCI, NATE LOWE, OSP, R. GOLDSTON, Inspector and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY V. LEPESH
Defendant:
BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent at O.S.P., MELISSA A. GILBERT, AKA M. Davidson, JEFF PRIMO and others
Damon Williams v. PRK Funding Services, Inc., et al
as 19-35746
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, RICHARD BESELIN, RONALD CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS
Lujan v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2019cv00205
Plaintiff:
Michael V Lujan
Defendant:
IDOC, Twin Falls Co Jail, State of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capps v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03147
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Charles G Capps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe W. May v. KushCo Holdings, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00798
Defendant:
Christopher Tedford, KushCo Holdings, Inc., Nicholas Kovacevich and others
Plaintiff:
Joe W. May
Petitioner:
Gower Golding, Mun Fye Chang, Richard Diamond and others
Capps v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02712
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Angel K Capps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capps v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv01725
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Capps
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damon Williams v. PRK Funding Services, Inc., et al
as 19-35120
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, RICHARD BESELIN, RONALD CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
