Cases 21 - 30 of 230
Wall v. Colbert
as 4:2022cv00448
Petitioner:
Dustin Alan Wall
Respondent:
Danon Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hill-Colbert v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2022cv01651
Plaintiff:
Marcus Hill-Colbert, Vincent Barnao, Jennifer Timmons and others
Defendant:
City of Roseville, Roseville Police Department and Tyler Cantley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woolsey v. Diaz et al
as 4:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
John Harry Woolsey, Jr.
Defendant:
Michelle Diaz, Unknown Colbert, Unknown Snodgrass and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrew Johnston v. Danon Colbert
as 22-16247
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW J. JOHNSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN DANON COLBERT
Garner v. Colbert
as 4:2022cv00331
Petitioner:
Steve J Garner
Respondent:
D Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Graziotti v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2022cv00322
Petitioner:
Matthew C Graziotti
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez, C Howard, Unknown Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Quint Abernathy et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04999
Plaintiff:
Quint Abernathy, Deletha Adams, Brooke Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Miller v. Colbert
as 4:2022cv00293
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Miller
Respondent:
Unknown Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Darden v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Roberto Antoine Darden and Roberto Darden
Defendant:
United States of America, Barbara Von Blanckensee, M Segal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Douglas Melter v. Danon Colbert
as 22-15847
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS MELTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DANON COLBERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
