Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Alvarado v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv02463
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Dax Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendy Townley, et al v. Ross Miller, et al
as 12-16882
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WENDY TOWNLEY, AMY WHITLOCK, ASHLEY GUNSON and others
Defendant:
ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State of Nevada
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
KINGSLEY EDWARDS
Wendy Townley, et al v. Ross Miller, et al
as 12-16881
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WENDY TOWNLEY, AMY WHITLOCK, ASHLEY GUNSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State of Nevada
Intervenor-Defendant:
KINGSLEY EDWARDS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00427
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
J & J Sports v. Abada et al
as 2:2010cv00610
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports
Defendant:
Adrian Abada and DAX EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Robert Icho, et al v. Mc Hammer, et al
as 10-15386
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT ICHO and ICHO GROUP, INC., a California corporation
Defendant:
PACKETSWITCH.COM, INC., WORLDHIT (MC HAMMER), a California corporation, STEVEN RISTAU and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MC HAMMER, AKA Stanley K. Burrell
Icho et al v. Packetswitch.com, Inc. et al
as 5:2001cv20858
Plaintiff:
Robert Icho and Icho Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Packetswitch.com, Inc., Worldhit (Mc Hammer), Steven Ristau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Dax Pierson v. Ford Motor Company
as 09-17642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAX PIERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Dax Pierson v. Ford Motor Company
as 09-17604
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAX PIERSON
Defendant - Appellant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-55225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
