Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Korab v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv00239
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Care Incorporated, Kelli Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Paul P Korab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaime Ellen Florman-Goforth v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2013cv08508
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Jaime Ellen Florman-Goforth
Cheryl Mauck et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv06343
Plaintiff:
Audrey Aho, Karen Babb, Mellissa Ballard and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Does
Tucson Airport Authority v. Goforth et al
as 4:2012mc00014
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Tucson Foundry & Manufacturing Incorporated, Arizona Board of Regents and others
Petitioner:
Tucson Airport Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Kevin King v. CDC, et al
as 11-15418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN EUGENE KING
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. L. RUNNELS, JEFFREY WILLIAM ROHLFING and others
Jaime E. Florman-Goforth v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2010cv02895
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jaime E. Florman-Goforth
Chatman v. Felker, et al
as 2:2003cv02415
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
T. Felker, Edward S. Alameida, Jr., Richard W. Sandham and others
Respondent:
Linda Rianda, Robert Presley, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DLC Dermacare LLC v. Castillo et al
as 2:2010cv00333
Defendant:
Dominic Moffo, Douglas Keverline, Gregory M Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
DLC Dermacare LLC
Petitioner:
Carl J Mudd
Trustee:
Robert A Mackenzie
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Henderson v. Goforth
as 3:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ivery Henderson
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Goforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Goforth-Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2009cv06122
Plaintiff:
Diane Goforth-Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
