Cases 21 - 30 of 687
Kelly v. Harris
as 3:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Dolores Kelly
Defendant:
Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Scott v. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, Donald J Trump, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Glasco v. Biden et al
as 2:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Tyrone C Glasco, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv07501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Barnes v. Harris et al
as 2:2022cv02175
Petitioner:
Antoine DeShawn Barnes
Respondent:
Kamala Harris and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rickey Louis Alford v. Joe Biden et al
as 2:2022cv08286
Plaintiff:
Rickey Louis Alford, Morris Day and Rickey L. Alford
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Diane Feinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv07216
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcos-Chavela v. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv01666
Plaintiff:
Susan Marcos-Chavela
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Tina Kotek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tutankhaman v. Harris
as 2:2022cv01486
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman, Grand Royal Prince Michael Dumpledore III and Michael Maxwell Hill
Defendant:
Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
