Cases 21 - 30 of 17,944
Lee v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02811
Petitioner:
Webster Lee
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hickey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lee Hickey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(HC) Lucas v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Petitioner:
David Lee Lucas
Respondent:
Placer County Superior Court and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Madsen, et al. v. Jacoby, et al.
as 24-2983
Plaintiff:
JOHN MADSEN, STEPHAN LAKE ADVENTURES, LLC and STEPHAN LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
RUSSELL LEE JACOBY, LAURA MAE JACOBY, KAYLEE LAMAE JACOBY and others
Erskine v. US. Government Agencies
as 6:2024cv00778
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Erskine
Respondent:
US. Government Agencies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kinnamon v. Thich
as 3:2024cv02784
Plaintiff:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Defendant:
Thich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
C. Finley v. Karen Bass et al
as 2:2024cv03894
Plaintiff:
C. Finley
Defendant:
Karen Bass, Eunisses Hernandez, Paul Krekorian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Osborne v. Vincent et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Jack Lee Osborne
Defendant:
Capt. Vincent, Deputy Fittings, Deputy Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02736
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Randall
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
