Cases 21 - 30 of 210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jamal Parker v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, Jamal El Trust, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Daniel Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2021cv06412
Plaintiff:
Daniel Adams, Pamela Aller, Maria Baiza and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Parker v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01143
Plaintiff:
Jamal Darius Parker Moor beneficiary, Jamal El Trust doing business as Jamal Darius Parker also known as Jamal El Trust and Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Michigan, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
