Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Peter Stavrianoudakis, et al v. USFWS, et al
as 22-16788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER STAVRIANOUDAKIS, KATHERINE STAVRIANOUDAKIS, SCOTT TIMMONS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CHARLTON H. BONHAM, in his official capacity as Director of California Department of Fish and Wildlife, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Deputy Director Exercising the Authority of the Director of California Department of Fish and Wildlife and others
Grand Canyon Wolf Recovery Project et al v. Haaland et al
as 4:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Grand Canyon Wolf Recovery Project, New Mexico Wilderness Association, Wildlands Network and others
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2022cv05216
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity, Environmental Protection Information Center and Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Debra Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Moore et al
as 4:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Maricopa Audubon Society and Mount Graham Coalition
Defendant:
Randy Moore, Tom Vilsack, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Western Watersheds Project et al v. Moore et al
as 9:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council and others
Defendant:
Randy Moore, United States Forest Service, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Fish Northwest v. Scott Rumsey, et al
as 22-35641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FISH NORTHWEST, a Washington non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT RUMSEY, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for NOAA Fisheries' West Coast Region, CHRIS OLIVER, in his official capacity as the Assistant Administrator for National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE and KELLY SUSEWIND, in his official capacity as Director of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al
as 9:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, The Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society Legislative Fund and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Olympic Forest Coalition v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2022cv05549
Plaintiff:
Olympic Forest Coalition
Defendant:
Fish and Wildlife Service United States, Martha Williams and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35583
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, by and through the Office of Species Conservation and the Idaho Fish and Game Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
