Cases 21 - 30 of 86
Marvin Harris v. Vaughn Walker, et al
as 17-17398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
VAUGHN R. WALKER, Administrative Law Judge, USDC Judge, S. COMMANDER, C.O., F. LOGEFEIL, C.O. and others
Walker v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2017cv04895
Plaintiff:
Alicia R Walker
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shufelt v. Silva et al
as 3:2017cv01652
Plaintiff:
George W. Shufelt
Defendant:
J. Silva, M.D., S. Pasha, M. Glynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2017cv02476
Plaintiff:
Alicia R Walker
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moreno v. Paramo et al
as 3:2017cv01449
Plaintiff:
Francisco Moreno
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, R. Walker, Tri Luu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean Schwartzmiller v. K. Rodriguez, et al
as 17-55980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN A. SCHWARTZMILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
K. RODRIGUEZ, Psychologist at the Richard J. Donovan State Prison (RJD), JOHN LARSON, NBC News Correspondent, NBC NEWS and others
Gomez v. Paramo et al
as 3:2017cv00834
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Gomez
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, R. Walker, A. Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Walker et al
as 3:2017cv00722
Plaintiff:
Darius Sims
Defendant:
R. Walker, J.K. Chau, D.J. Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Kernan et al
as 3:2017cv00693
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown and Larry E. Belton, Sr.
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, California Health Care Services, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle Davis v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 17-55390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOYLE WAYNE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden, R.J. Donovan Prison, M. GLYNN, Chief Executive Officer, S. ROBERTS, Chief Medical Executive and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
