Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Robert Anderson et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv08019
Plaintiff:
Robert Anderson and Marques T. Sutton
Defendant:
Does and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
MTGLQ Investors, LP v. Manuel C. Roxas et al
as 8:2017cv01826
Defendant:
Robert Anderson, Does and Manuel C. Roxas
Plaintiff:
MTGLQ Investors, LP
Anderson v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv00982
Plaintiff:
Robert Anderson
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cifuentes et al v. Keast et al
as 3:2017cv00575
Plaintiff:
Glendy Cifuentes and H.D.C.
Defendant:
Cynthia Keast , Sean Fahy , Robert Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Martin, et al v. City of Boise
as 15-35845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARTIN, LAWRENCE LEE SMITH, ROBERT ANDERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BOISE
Ana M. Hanson et al v. Gypsum Enterprises Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01147
Defendant:
American Contractors Indemnity Company, Robert Anderson, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Ana M Hanson and Corinne Koch
Oropeza v. Anderson
as 2:2014cv02108
Respondent:
Robert Anderson
Petitioner:
Frederico Oropeza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downs v. Foulk et al
as 3:2014cv01745
Petitioner:
Gregory Downs
Respondent:
F. Foulk and Robert Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alim Abdurahman et al v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLC, et al
as 2:2014cv04366
Plaintiff:
Alim Abdurahman, John Abel, Lena Abel and others
Defendant:
Alexandria Hyundai, LLC, Brown's Leesburg Hyundai, LLC, Brown's Manassas Hyundai, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christine Hauck v. Phillip Walker, et al
as 14-35299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINE D. HAUCK
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILLIP D. WALKER, individually and in his capacity as a Clark County Deputy Sheriff, ROBERT ANDERSON, individually and in his official capacity and GARRY LUCAS, Clark County Sheriff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
