Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Baugh v. Holder et al
as 3:2013cv00561
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Baugh
Defendant:
City of Portland Oregon, John Doe 1-2, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lummus v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv02377
Plaintiff:
Robert Gordon Lummus
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roberts et al v. Heating Specialist Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01820
Cross Claimant:
Robert Gordon, Heating Specialist Inc. and IRS Environmental of Portland, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Robert Gordon, Heating Specialist Inc., Heating Specialist Inc. and others
Defendant:
Robert Gordon, Heating Specialist Inc. and IRS Environmental of Portland, Inc.
Plaintiff:
George Roberts and Nancy Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 CERCLA Hazardous Waste Cleanup Costs
Robert Gordon Lockwood v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv07568
Petitioner:
Robert Gordon Lockwood
Respondent:
United States of America
Robert Gordon Hughes v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2011cv09608
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Robert Gordon Hughes
Ronald Baugh v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-35145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD M. BAUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FBI and others
Ronald Baugh v. USDC-ORP
as 10-73876
:
In re: RONALD M. BAUGH
Petitioner:
RONALD M. BAUGH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States of America, in his individual and official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Gordon v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2010cv05399
Plaintiff:
Robert Gordon
Defendant:
Metroplitan Life Insurance Company and Borland Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
