Cases 21 - 30 of 1,446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jaime Castaneda v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv02392
Plaintiff:
Jaime Castaneda
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Officer O'Connor, Officer Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cipriano Vargas v. Morris Alterman
as 2:2024cv02352
Plaintiff:
Cipriano Vargas
Defendant:
Cathy Morris Alterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cano Velandia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1409
Petitioner:
DEISY ANDRE CANO VELANDIA, JHOSETH SNAYDER VARGAS-CANO, KENNETH M VARGAS-CANO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
S.Q. v. Echtenkamp et al
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
S. Q.
Defendant:
Emily Echtenkamp, Loren Calkins, Juan Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
4340 W. Adams, LLC v. Berta Yaneth Alvarado Flores et al
as 2:2024cv01815
Plaintiff:
4340 W. Adams, LLC
Defendant:
Berta Yanet Alvarado Flores, Hector Mario Santiesteban Carreno, Eliseo Vargas and others
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, J Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Elko County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Amos Jackson
Defendant:
Elko County Sheriff, Gonzales, A. Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. SFM, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Vicmarie Cruz Vargas
Defendant:
SFM, LLC and Sabrina Ruybal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
