Cases 31 - 40 of 14,957
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Young v. Multnomah County Court et al
as 3:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Anthony Young
Defendant:
Multnomah County Court, Judge Jacqueline Alarcon, Judge Patricia L. McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Swetala v. Quten Research Institute, LLC
as 1:2024at00418
Plaintiff:
Anthony Swetala
Defendant:
Quten Research Institute, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr. v. Superior Court Antelope Valley et al
as 5:2024cv01105
Petitioner:
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr.
Respondent:
Superior Court Antelope Valley and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winterer v. United States
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swetala v. Quten Research Institute, LLC
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Anthony Swetala
Defendant:
Quten Research Institute, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sarhad v. Secura Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sarhad
Defendant:
Secura Insurance Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Lloyd's of London Syndicate 2987 v. Eagle Country Construction Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Lloyd's of London Syndicate 2987
Defendant:
Eagle Country Construction Inc, Innovative Investments Inc, Michael J. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
