Cases 31 - 40 of 182
Turner v. Allred et al
as 4:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dwayne Turner
Defendant:
Preston Allred, Summit Food Services, Graham, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Allred et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Manuel Moreno, Jr.
Defendant:
Preston Allred, Summit Food Services and AMS Vending Machines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gray v. Higgins et al
as 2:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Edward Eugene Gray, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Higgins, Allred and Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Betani #217768 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08024
Plaintiff:
Duran Betani
Defendant:
David Shinn, M Allred, Unknown Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mary Rogers v. Donna Allred, et al
as 22-15471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY A. NELSON ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA ALLRED, Sacramento County Clerk Recorder, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE, INC.
(PC) Black v. Thompson et al
as 2:2021cv02167
Plaintiff:
Randy Lamar Black
Defendant:
P. Thompson, K. Brown, A. Boulware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS)Nelson-Rogers v. Allred et al
as 2:2021cv01908
Plaintiff:
Mary Alice Nelson-Rogers
Defendant:
Donna Allred, JP Chase Morgan Chase, Inc. and Quality Loan Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SOPH-SAH LLC v. Maria Allred et al
as 5:2021cv01937
Plaintiff:
SOPH-SAH LLC
Defendant:
Mrs Maria Allred, Mr Joseph Allred and Does 1 to 10 Inclusive
(PS) Nelson-Rogers v. Allred
as 2:2021cv01809
Plaintiff:
Mary Alice Nelson Rogers and Mary Alice Nelson-Rogers
Defendant:
Donna Allred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Donaldson v. Garland et al
as 2:2021cv01178
Plaintiff:
Richard Julius Donaldson
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, J. Salazar, J. Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
