Cases 31 - 40 of 692
Manley Barton v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 23-15902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANLEY BARTON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RELOCATION, an administrative agency of the United States
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
(HC) Barton v. California Mens Colony
as 2:2023cv00995
Petitioner:
William Barton
Respondent:
California Mens Colony
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barton v. The Rian Group Inc et al
as 3:2023cv05452
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
The Rian Group, Inc. and Aaron Rian
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
(PC) Love v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Felton Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Tracy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J. Aguirre, et al v. Alejandro Villanueva, et al
as 23-55315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. AGUIRRE, J. ROLDAN, J. STANLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO VILLANUEVA, KATHRYN BARGER, JANICE HAHN and others
Barton L. Clement v. Mitsubishi Financial Group
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Barton L. Clement
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Financial Group
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Foley v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Matthew V Foley, Jr.
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Arizona, State of, Tucson Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovoi v. Barton et al
as 4:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Gerald Joseph Lovoi
Defendant:
Richard Barton, Rodolphe Belmer, Mathias Dopfner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
