Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Jim Bynum v. Shawn Hatton
as 17-72282
Petitioner:
JIM CARTER BYNUM
Respondent:
SHAWN HATTON, Warden, Warden
Bynum v. City of Las Vegas et al
as 2:2017cv02102
Plaintiff:
Charlene Bynum
Defendant:
Jesse Lee Cesena, City of Las Vegas, City of North Las Vegas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Higgins v. Laterza et al
as 2:2016cv03943
Plaintiff:
Derek Duane Higgins
Defendant:
Robert Laterza, Main Event Entertainment LP, Josh Bynum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2016cv02553
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell , Armando Aguilar , Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ehringer v. State of California et al
as 2:2016cv01955
Plaintiff:
Orion S. Ehringer
Defendant:
State of California, Sierra County, Darden Bynum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bynum v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01887
Plaintiff:
Bethany H. Bynum
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bynum v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv05861
Plaintiff:
Eddie Bynum
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Patricia Mashburn et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09039
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., AbbVie Products LLC, Abbott Laboratories and others
Plaintiff:
Harlan Ailes, Alex Arredondo, William J. Baker and others
Chamar Bynum v. Emmanuel Pacquiao et al
as 2:2015cv06574
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Todd Dubeof, Home Box Office Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Chamar Bynum
In Re:Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation
as 2:2015ml02639
In Re:
Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Tjaden, John Assalian, Enrique Barrios and others
Petitioner:
Showtime Networks Inc., Attorney Edgardo Lopez, Mr. Maximino Lopez and others
Defendant:
Floyd Mayweather, Mayweather Promotions LLC, EMMANUEL D. PACQUAIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
