Cases 31 - 40 of 2,623
Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05562
Plaintiff:
Jill Cook
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cook v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-4255
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner:
SEANTAIN COOK
Cruz v. M. et al
as 3:2024cv00305
Defendant:
Garcia, Bill A. Gittere, Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benshoof, et al. v. Admon, et al.
as 24-4223
Defendant:
BLAIR RUSS, WILLIE GREGORY, MAGALIE LERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
BRIANA GAGE and KURT BENSHOOF
Acosta v. Goldman's Best Cooking LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01693
Defendant:
Rozalia Goldman, Gregorio Cervantes and Goldman's Best Cooking LLC
Plaintiff:
Yesenia Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ackerman v. Cooke et al
as 2:2024cv01233
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, William Ruebart, Warden William Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Dreesen et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Defendant:
Julie Williams, Steven Torres, Richard Cody Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Sankona Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton #353239 v. Shivers et al
as 4:2024cv00330
Defendant:
Unknown Gil, Unknown Quinn, Bryan C Shivers and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Desean Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam John MacKintosh v. Tim Cook et al
as 2:2024cv05854
Defendant:
Marc Lewis, Lewis and Llewellyn, LLP, Arturo Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Adam John MacKintosh
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cook v. Trepco West
as 2:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Aaron Cook
Defendant:
Trepco West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
