Cases 31 - 40 of 305
Capri v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Richard Capri
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Charles Daniels, Michael Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Minev et al
as 2:2022cv01782
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Lawrence
Defendant:
Dr. Minev, Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faulkner #082417 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey James Faulkner
Defendant:
David Shinn and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Bruzzone v. James McManis, et al
as 22-16474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES MCMANIS, WILLIAM FAULKNER and WILLIAM HASKELL ALSUP
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ginger Ameigh et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05048
Plaintiff:
Ginger Ameigh, Christi Baker, Robert Boepple and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Harvey Alequin et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04963
Plaintiff:
Deborah Kranz-Mitchell, Harvey Alequin, Mark Allesandro and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Picozzi v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv01011
Defendant:
Julie Matousek, Danyele Sipes, State of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hano v. Minev et al
as 3:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
David Hano
Defendant:
Michael Minev, Brian Williams, John Faulkner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
Clarke v. Faulkner
as 1:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Harris Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
