Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Blakely v. Key et al
as 2:2018cv00326
Respondent:
James R Key and Judge Michael P Price
Petitioner:
Ralph Howard Blakely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2018cv01056
Plaintiff:
Anne Block and Anne K Block
Defendant:
Judge Michael R Scott, Anne Marie Soto, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Block v. King County Superior Court et al
as 3:2018cv05579
Plaintiff:
Anne Block and Anne K Block
Defendant:
Anne Marie Soto, Laura Inveen, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rickey Alford v. Donald Trump et al
as 2:2018cv02392
Plaintiff:
Rickey Alford
Defendant:
Judge Andre Birotte Jr., Judge Andre Birotte Jr., Jerry Brown and others
Rickey Alford v. Andre Birotte et al
as 2:2018cv02287
Plaintiff:
Rickey Alford
Defendant:
Judge Andre Birotte, Jr, Judge Andre Birotte, Jr, Christopher I. and others
Arpino v. Cherry et al
as 3:2017cv00527
Petitioner:
John Francis Arpino
Respondent:
Judge Janet J Berry, Chief Justice Michael A Cherry, Nathan Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Arpino v. Cherry et al
as 2:2017cv02266
Petitioner:
John Francis Arpino
Respondent:
Judge Janet J Berry, Chief Justice Michael A Cherry, Nathan Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
McKnight v. Kolberg et al
as 2:2017cv01344
Defendant:
ADA Adam Gibb, Judge Michael Greenlick, ADA Dave Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Tim McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medenbach v. McShane et al
as 1:2017cv00751
Defendant:
Asst U.S. Attorney Douglas W. Fong and U.S. District Judge Michael McShane
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Medenbach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
