Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Wiideman v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv00329
Defendant:
Daniel Angus and Karen Smith
Plaintiff:
Randal N. Wiideman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Michael Clark v. Karen Smith
as 10-15877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN SMITH
Ransey v. Williams et al
as 2:2009cv00827
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ransey
Defendant:
Brian Williams and Karen Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiideman v. Smith
as 2:2009cv00598
Plaintiff:
Randal N. Wiideman
Defendant:
Karen Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wind River Resources, LLC et al v. Frisby et al
as 3:2009cv08023
Plaintiff:
Wind River Resources, LLC, Wind River Resources, LLC, Erika Van Alstine and others
Defendant:
Herb Guenther, Herb Guenther, Karen Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wind River Resources et al v. Frisby
as 2:2008cv00653
Plaintiff:
Wind River Resources, Wind River Resources, Erika Van Alstine and others
Defendant:
Bob Frisby, Herb Guenther, Karen Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doctor et al v. Coleman et al
as 3:2007cv03270
Plaintiff:
Avis Doctor, Chari Ogogo, Paulette Mayo and others
Defendant:
North American Title Company Inc., Old Republic Title Company, Charles E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson et al. v. Goddard et al
as 2:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
George H. Johnson, George H. Johnson, George H. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Terry Goddard, Terry Goddard, Jane Doe Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stan Lee Media Inc, et al v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, et al
as 2:2003cv01036
Plaintiff:
Stan Lee Media Inc
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Jonathan Gordon, Karen Smith and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
