Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Kitti Payne v. Publishers Clearing House, Inc, et al
as 16-16478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KITTI RUTH PAYNE, AKA Kitti Ruth Power
Defendant - Appellee:
PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE, INC., MARGARET CROSSAN, DAVE SAYER and others
Payne v. Publishers Clearing House, Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
Kitti Ruth Payne
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House, Inc., Margaret Crossan, Dave Sayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lily Jeung et al v. Yelp Inc
as 3:2015cv02228
Plaintiff:
Lily Jeung, Amy Sayers and Darren Walchesky
Defendant:
Yelp Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lily Jeung et al v. Yelp Inc
as 4:2015cv02228
Plaintiff:
Lily Jeung , Amy Sayers and Darren Walchesky
Defendant:
Yelp Inc.
Mediator:
Robert D Coviello
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sayers v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00160
Petitioner:
David A Sayers
Respondent:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pianka v. DeRosa et al
as 2:2014cv02644
Plaintiff:
Victor Pianka
Defendant:
Charles DeRosa, Unknown Sayer, Unknown Osuna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lily Jeung et al v. Yelp Inc
as 2:2014cv06223
Plaintiff:
Lily Jeung, Amy Sayers and Darren Walchesky
Defendant:
Yelp Inc
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Robert D Coviello
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gornick v. PBSP-Medical/CDCR et al
as 4:2014cv03124
Plaintiff:
Paul Apollo Gornick, Sr.
Defendant:
PBSP-Medical/CDCR, Lambert, N. Ikegbu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayers v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00253
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Diana L. Sayers
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
In re: Darrel Mo
as 14-60031
Debtor:
In re: DARREL LINN MOSS, Esquire
Appellant:
SHARON BOYCE and KYEANN SAYER
Appellee:
RICHARD JOSEPH SAMSON, Chapter 7 Trustee and DARREL LINN MOSS, Esquire
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
