Cases 31 - 40 of 245
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15934
Defendant / Appellee:
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Defendant:
NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant:
KELLY KRESS, SHANNON CASHION, W. CHRISTOPHER MCDONOUGH and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
In re: Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15365
Defendant / Appellee:
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Appellant:
JOSEPH DARRELL PALMER, ALISON PAUL and LEVETA CHESSER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
In re: Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. Alison Paul, et al
as 12-16830
Defendant / Appellee:
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Appellant:
JOHNNY KESSEL and ALISON PAUL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
In re: Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15929
Defendant / Appellee:
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Appellant:
JOHNNY KESSEL, ALISON PAUL and LEVETA CHESSER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 3:2011cv02591
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
De Lage Landen Financial Services Incorporated et al v. Tucson Greyhound Park Incorporated
as 4:2013mc00011
Plaintiff:
De Lage Landen Financial Services Incorporated
Defendant:
Tucson Greyhound Park Incorporated
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Tucson Greyhound Park Incorporated
Thirdparty_defendant:
Sharp Electronics Corporation , Michael Dillon and Unknown Dillon
Movant:
Sharp Electronics Corporation and Michael Dillon
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re: Ira Connor, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-16793
:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Objector - Appellant:
IRA CONNOR ERWIN, LUIS MARIO SANTANA and STEFAN REST
Defendant - Appellee:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SHARP CORPORATION and others
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 12-16839
Defendant / Appellee:
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Appellant:
ANDREA KANE
Sharp Electronics Corporation et al v. Koninkliike Philips Electronics N.V. et al
as 3:2013cv02776
Plaintiff:
Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc.
Defendant:
Koninkliike Philips Electronics N.V., Philips Electronics Industries (Taiwan) Ltd, Philips Electronics North America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Keena Dale, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-16216
:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Objector - Appellant:
KEENA DALE
Defendant - Appellee:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SHARP CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
