Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Trueblood v. Ryan et al
as 4:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Adam-Lee Trueblood
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Keith Smith and Ronald Towles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towles v. Baca et al
as 3:2016cv00050
Respondent:
Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Dee V. Towles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sagent Energy, LLC v. US Capital Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv05432
Defendant:
US Capital Partners, LLC, Jeffery Sweeney, Charles V Towle and others
Plaintiff:
Sagent Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Troupe v. Swain et al
as 3:2014cv05886
Plaintiff:
David Troupe
Defendant:
William Swain, Thomas A L'Heureux, James W Jolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr #177026 v. Towles et al
as 2:2014cv01860
Plaintiff:
Emery Carr
Defendant:
Ronald Towles, Charles L Ryan, Stacey Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kern Ridge Growers, LLC v. Seacoast Distributing, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00820
Plaintiff:
Kern Ridge Growers, LLC
Defendant:
Victor M. Rodriguez, Seacoast Distributing, Inc. and Vincent R. Towles
Quezada v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv01052
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Ronald Towles and others
Plaintiff:
David Terrazas Quezada, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sergei Portnoy v. County of Yolo, et al
as 13-17321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SERGEI PORTNOY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF YOLO, YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MONROE DETENTION CENTER and others
Towles v. Baca et al
as 3:2013cv00576
Respondent:
Warden Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Dee V. Towles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sergei Portnoy v. City of Woodland, et al
as 13-16384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SERGEI PORTNOY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WOODLAND, TOWLE, Detective, # 883, CHAN, Officer, #806 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
