Cases 41 - 50 of 3,891
Piombino v. City of Fresno, et al.
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Piombino
Defendant:
City of Fresno, Steve Rocha and Corey Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benshoof et al v. City of Shoreline et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Benshoof, Briana D Gage and Kurt Benshoof
Defendant:
City of Shoreline, King County, Town & Country Markets and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Louis Gries v. Robyn Taylor et al
as 8:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Louis Gries
Defendant:
Robyn Taylor, Alex Evans and Does 1 to 10 inclusive
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, J Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Richard M Johnson, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. McAllister
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Austin Chance Evans
Defendant:
Megann Nicole McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DeCastro v. Mcknight et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jose M DeCastro
Defendant:
Evan Mcknight, Pam Wagner, Brad Spoljaric and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson, et al. v. Snohomish Regional Fire and Rescue, et al.
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DAVID PETERSON, JAY STICKNEY, BEAU WATSON and others
Defendant:
SNOHOMISH REGIONAL FIRE AND RESCUE and KEVIN O'BRIEN, Chief
Center for Investigative Reporting, et al. v. United States Department of Labor
as 24-880
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING and WILL EVANS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Evans Adhesive Corporation v. Golden State Adhesives, Inc.
as 2:2024mc00026
Plaintiff:
EVANS ADHESIVE CORPORATION,
Defendant:
GOLDEN STATE ADHESIVES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
