Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Budd v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2017cv05966
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Budd
Defendant:
Carlos Rodriguez and Coreen E Schnepf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leo v. Appfolio, Inc.
as 3:2017cv05771
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Leo
Defendant:
Appfolio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Anthony Hill
as 17-35719
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMES HILL
Anthony Merrick v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16662
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMES MERRICK
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA and CHARLES L. RYAN
Bandalan v. CIT Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Bandalan , Arceli Asuncion Bandalan and Anthony J. Bandalan, Jr.
Defendant:
CIT Bank N.A. , Federal National Mortgage Association and Doe Defendants 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Anthony Merrick v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMES MERRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and MICHAEL LINDERMAN
Anthony Merrick v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-15558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMES MERRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, KAREN BARCKLAY-DODSON, Doctor at Arizona State Prison - Yuma and CORIZON HEALTH, INC.
Cianciolo v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Cianciolo
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health and Richard Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Anthony James Paxton et al
as 2:2016cv08196
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Anthony James Paxton and Ernest Polk, Jr.
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Anthony James Paxton et al
as 2:2016cv07330
Defendant:
Does, Anthony James Paxton, Ernest Polk, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
