Cases 41 - 50 of 744
Robin Row v. Janell Clement, et al
as 23-99004
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBIN LEE ROW
Respondent / Appellee:
JANELL CLEMENT, THOMAS J. BEAUCLAIR and BRIAN UNDERWOOD
Johnson v. Fluo Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Johnson
Defendant:
Fluo Labs, Inc., Richard W. Clement, Jan Enemaerke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 oc Removal- Other Contract
Eugene Cuthbert v. USA
as 23-35270
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE CLEMENT CUTHBERT
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lopez-Mejia v. Garland
as 23-601
Petitioner:
CLEMENTE GABRIEL LOPEZ-MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Barton L. Clement v. Mitsubishi Financial Group
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Barton L. Clement
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Financial Group
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clements v. Judge Naftz et al
as 4:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Amber M Clements
Respondent:
Judge Naftz and Sheriff Tony Manu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strock v. Gulick et al
as 2:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jacob Strock
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick, Dr. Bryon Hemphill, Lisa Koltes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd R.G. Hill et al v. The Board of Directors, Officers and Agents and Individuals of the Peoples College of Law et al
as 2:2023cv01298
Defendant:
Hector Candelario Pena Ramirez, Jessica Viramontes, The Board of Directors, Officers and Agents and Individuals of the Peoples College of Law and others
Plaintiff:
Todd R. G. Hill
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ruiz v. Nieto et al
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Enrique Pena Nieto, Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda, Jesus Gabriel Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
