Cases 41 - 50 of 184
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Ruiping et al
as 2:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Halaoda Fujian Shipinyouxiangongsi, Cedric Jackson an individual doing business as Colby Wayne Clothing LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc., Dutch Blitz Acquisition Corporation and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Thomason v. Walmart Inc
as 2:2020cv00480
Plaintiff:
Colby Thomason
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aplin et al v. Oregon State Hospital
as 6:2020cv02178
Plaintiff:
Jim Warberg, Colby Aplin and Robin Vickio
Defendant:
Oregon State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandlin v. JUUL Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as PAX Labs, Inc. and PLOOM Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv07604
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Mother Murphy's Labs, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Colby Sandlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eduardo Lopez Gonzalez v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv09875
Defendant:
Matthew James Perez, Marc Antrim, Christopher Myung Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lopez Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2020cv09870
Defendant:
Matthew James Perez, Marc Antrim, Christopher Myung Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colby v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv06403
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Deven Colby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aplin v. Fraiser
as 3:2020cv01359
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Aplin
Defendant:
Fraiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
