Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Harwood v. Hall
as 6:2015cv00970
Respondent:
Gary Hall
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lorren Harwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saeedah Harwood v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2014cv08119
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Saeedah Harwood
Jackson v. Amero et al
as 2:2014cv01959
Plaintiff:
Duane Warren Jackson
Defendant:
A. Amero, R Harwood and - Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvador V. Enriquez et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2014cv04110
Plaintiff:
Wade W. Abraham, Jr., Jacqueline Achane, Kevin Achane and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Standley v. Atkinson et al
as 3:2013cv05156
Plaintiff:
Willie Standley
Defendant:
Thomas Atkinson, Nicole LeBas, Sue Harwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Harwood et al
as 2:2013cv00181
Defendant:
Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC, CBS Corporation and William G. Harwood
Plaintiff:
Wayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Jennifer Harwood v. Crestar Mortgage, et al
as 13-15086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENNIFER MICHELE HARWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
CRESTAR MORTGAGE, SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC and others
Corkerin et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv04803
Plaintiff:
Vertus Corkerin , Andrew Harris , Susan Stewart and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alan Harwood v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-16241
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALAN E. HARWOOD
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Harwood v. Crestar Mortgage et al
as 2:2012cv01067
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Michele Harwood
Defendant:
Crestar Mortgage , Suntrust Mortgage , Nationstar Mortgage LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
