Cases 41 - 50 of 3,788
Marshall v. Mason
as 2:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Steven Maurice Marshall
Respondent:
Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. State of California, et al.
as 24-1938
Plaintiff:
GUS WHO MARSHALL
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, VALLEY WATER, State owned company and others
Davis v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Zdenek Davis
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Unknown USMS Agents of Billings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Knight v. Kline et al
as 2:2024cv00335
Petitioner:
Harry Alexander Knight
Respondent:
Unknown Kline, United States Marshals Service and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelemen v. Hamlin, et al.
as 24-1906
Plaintiff:
JASON JOSEPH KELEMEN
Defendant:
JOHN HAMLIN, WILLIAM MARSHALL, EVELYN CANTENO and others
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024mc00008
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Richmond v. Reese, et al.
as 24-1811
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Defendant:
MICHAEL REESE, Multnomah County Sheriff, STEVEN ALEXANDER and KURTISS MORRISON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Marshall v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Gus Who Marshall
Defendant:
State of California, U.S. Government, Valley Water and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
