Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fraire v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
as 2:2014cv02573
Plaintiff:
Jose Tomas Fraire
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court, Brian S Rees and Casey J Newcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newcomb v. Bargreen Ellingson of Oregon, Inc.
as 6:2014cv01760
Defendant:
Bargreen Ellingson of Oregon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Terry Newcomb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wolfe v. Garcia et al
as 2:2014cv01559
Plaintiff:
Russell Wolfe
Defendant:
Daniel V Garcia, Unknown Rueter, KC Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lei v. City of Lynden et al
as 2:2014cv00650
Plaintiff:
Jiangong Lei
Defendant:
City of Lynden, Lynden Chamber of Commerce, Lynden Tribune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Newcomb Anderson McCormick, Inc. v. ARC Alternatives et al
as 3:2014cv01870
Plaintiff:
Newcomb Anderson McCormick, Inc.
Defendant:
ARC Alternatives , Russell Driver , Curtis Schmitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Segalilt Siegel et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01807
Plaintiff:
Glennie Bligen, Mary Bradley, Mary Brooks and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Nicola Taysom v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-35021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLA JO NEWCOMB TAYSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States, JOSEPH BIDEN, Vice President of the United States, US CABINET MEMBERS and others
Newcomb Taysom v. O'bama et al
as 4:2013cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicola Jo Newcomb Taysom
Defendant:
Barack O'bama, Joseph Biden, US Cabinet Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
